Michael Moore rally at Toledo's Seagate Center (yes, I need to get a new camera eventually).
It was an interesting night. I went with some Psychology department people. When we arrived, there were people outside who were protesting Moore's appearance...they were positive for Bush or anti-Kerry or anti-Moore. There were probably only 20 people or so. The most idiotic was a sign that said that Moore stated "'Of course [Kerry's] a lousy candidate, he's a Democrat'- Michael Moore" I found this funny because it is an extension of the Bush campaign "consistency is all we have going for us" campaign. I am sure that none of the zealots who were attending last night (ok, there were a few normal people and a FEW republicans, even) (oops, did I just call republicans not normal?) would be persuaded to vote for anyone other than the most-likely-to-win non-Bush. The other signs were even less spectacular. They were just name-calling.
Except for the anti-abortion people. They are at every political event. And I feel for them (I think I have my thinking about the matter cleared up a little--stick with me here).
Right-to-life thought experiment starting here. To the disappointment of all who oppose abortion, I cannot see any political candidate or party making any moves that will substantially change the abortion climate. So we might as well support those who believe in the importance of life in other venues. Many more people die from starvation, preventable disease, and war than from abortion in the US. This is the essence of my new thought. I looked up some quick (likely to be somewhat inaccurate) numbers: 35,000 people die each day from starvation. Add 15,000 for water-borne diseases and AIDS. 4,000 abortions are performed each day in the US. Yes, I am calculating worldwide rates for starvation/water-borne disease/AIDS vs just the US abortion rate. The reason for this is that US citizens cannot legislate abortion law for other countries, and never will be able to. However, US citizens CAN fund research and aid programs that influence the other causes of death. I believe that this is the only responsible way to look at the numbers (but so it is known, there are 120,000 abortions worldwide per day, and I don't understand this number--it is disgustingly high). As far as the US should care: 50,000 deaths vs 4,000 deaths, PER DAY. Yes, the abortion number is disgusting and horribly high, but the other number is, well, 20 times worse. So I prefer a politician who prioritizes alleviating starvation and preventable diseases over one who prioritizes appearing to be anti-abortion, because there is car more room for starvation/preventable diseases alleviation to save life. Too bad we cannot have both viewpoints in the same person. Then people who want to vote under the pretense of "sanctity of life above all else" will have a real choice. Until then, they SHOULD vote for the person who appears to put the biggest dent in the largest causes of death, whether it be abortion, starvation, disease, or war. At least logically. At least according to me.
I hope that rant made it clear that one can believe that perserving life is important and still not have a clear decision in the voting booth. I also hope it puts some perspective on how insignificant the 4,000 deaths from the WTC bombing and the 1,200 deaths of US troops are...at least at a global scale. Man, this is depressing. End of right-to-life rant.
So, a Michael Moore "rally" is essentially a person going up to a microphone and creatively reading a list of the democratic position on various social and political issues. People give cheers of affirmation after each line. It was ok for a while, but by the end even the community democratic leaders were looking sleepy (it ran from 9-11 pm, approximately) Ok, that affirmative time-wasting was MOST of it.
The night went as follows (as I remember it):
Gloria Steinem (activist, who is a East Toledo native),
Dale Kapszukiewicz (candidate for Lucas County Treasurer),
Michael Moore,
Roseanne Arnold/Barr (yes, really--and although she was interesting, she was not very funny),
Mike again,
The guitarist from Rage Against the Machine (who played 3 miserable folk songs--he played/sang well, but they were musically and poetically uninteresting),
Mike again,
A Marine Corporal who was in Farenheit 9/11 (who was not a great speaker, but was sounded like a nice guy--unfortunately the night was feeling REALLY long by the time he came up),
Mike again to end.
The good stuff was that Michael Moore is a funny speaker, and a good one at that. He upstaged Roseanne, which is saying a lot, seeing as she was a major comedian for so long. His next movie is against HMOs and drug companies. Knowing this Pfizer issued a "Moore alert," which he read. It was hilarious--and he gave us the number that Pfizer employees are supposed to call if the see a "bearded, heavyset man comeing at them with a microphone." He had us all call the number (212.573.1226) on our mobile phones. He also showed us some of the Bush commericials that his group made. I assume they will be on michaelmoore.com soon. They were pretty darn funny--and rather scathing. He also talked about some good social issues, like our lazy and over-complicated voting process, why politicians underestimate young people, injustices that occur in the political arena, and a few other things. I learned a bit. He threw Ramen noodles and underwear at the new voters, as a symbol of his gratitude for them voting.
I am glad I went to the rally, but it was not as funny as I had hoped. It was a really predictable affirmation session. To be fair, it also did a bit of fear-mongering, some of which may be unfair (such as spreading rumors about Bush reinstating a draft). Nevertheless, the rally worked overall--it was inspiring.
In other (i.e. important to Neil) news...I had my dissertation proposal defense yesterday. I had 3 of the 4 members in attendance and 1 made comments. I passed the important parts (the completed and proposed experiments were passed) but I have to redo my presentation. So I officially did not pass. I think it came down to the fact that I misinterpreted several questions and answered them with the wrong information or did not answer them at all. I have the self-serving alibi that if things were asked differently, I could have done much better. I can also blame the misinterpretations on myself. This is because I was too nervous to interpret the abstract portions of the questions sufficently. I can accept the verdict. It really isn't that bad. So what? I get to work on my presentation skills. That is wonderful. I thought I was getting better already, but I guess I get to continue getting better. [On a cynical note, I wish the department would not have rejected me for a teaching assignment when I wanted one last year--they denied me public presentation experience then, but require that I have that skill now.]
Not to end on a negative note, I should be able to get the presentation project going today, and get a good presentation ready in a short time.
And we are celebrating my (experiment) proposal pass today at BG Frickers at 6pm. Be there. Yeah, everyone. Not just department people.
Now to square away some BG city tax stuff--then go to school.